MY LITTLE PONY FIGHTING IS MAGIC SCOOTER FULL
Four incumbents-AT&T, BellSouth, QWest, and Verizon-received full price deregulation in over 100 major metropolitan areas. They asked for, and got, yearly reductions in price cap levels based on agreed-upon percentages: three percent in 2000, and 6.5 percent for the next three years. In addition, in 2000 the big carriers created a lobby called the Coalition for Affordable Local and Long Distance Service (CALLS). That meant, to the FCC, that the agency could lift price caps in those areas depending on how much competitive development they had determined had been achieved. If enough special access creating telecommunications infrastructure had "aggregated" or "colocated" in an urban area with more than 50,000 people-the agency would regard this as a sign of significant competition. It issued an order that gave the green light to the dismantling of special access price caps under certain conditions. The FCC, however, kept working under the assumption that deregulation would encourage the construction of more capacity. Policy makers figured that investors would pour capital into building out the nation's "middle mile" broadband capacity, making it easy and cheap for big corporations and wireless companies to rent lines for enterprise computing and backhaul-the circuits that link cell phone towers to network switches. Back when Congress created the 1996 Telecommunications Act, everybody was excited about the dot com boom. Here's the NoChokePoints version of the last decade regarding special access (more or less). "And that failure has been accelerating." Colocate me "We think the deregulatory, hands-off approach, has demonstrably failed," McKee explained. They're hoping that the new FCC that is coming will take a new approach to this matter.
MY LITTLE PONY FIGHTING IS MAGIC SCOOTER PLUS
Signed, Sprint, T-Mobile, tw-telecom, Clearwire, cbeyond, and about five other small- to medium-sized telcos, plus some advocacy groups: Public Knowledge, Media Access Project, and New America. "The inflated rates many are forced to pay the entities that control this market are taking dollars away from already-struggling consumers, companies working hard to save jobs, and innovators that want to expand broadband service across America." "We urge you to act now, in 2009, to provide relief from this high-capacity broadband chokepoint (referred to as 'special access' in the FCC’s rules)," they concluded. The team wrote a letter to interim FCC Chair Michael Copps on Friday. NoChokePoints wants to shut that party down. And all they're doing is flipping a couple of switches to add some more capacity."įor the last ten years, the Federal Communications Commission has been deregulating special access rates. Every bit of that infrastructure was built on the backs of ratepayers when they were a monopoly. "Well, that is just the biggest bunch of baloney. "When you hear these RBOCs talk, you'd think they were out there risking it all, risking it all on investment," Charles McKee, Sprint-Nextel's vice president of Government Affairs told us. He kept talking about "the RBOCs," which to the innocent ear might mean designer sneakers, but in fact stands for Regional Bell Operating Company, the owners of those special access lines, most notably AT&T and Verizon. Ars called up one of the rumblers after the conference, and he sounded pretty pissed. The NoChokePointers had themselves a big press conference in Washington, D.C. Launched this week, the NoChokePoints Coalition is basically a gang of heavy broadband users and their allies who have one thing in common: they're extra sick and tired of paying over-the-top dollar for "special access"-the dedicated lines companies need to connect their high-speed Internet circuits to the larger broadband economy. You know that there's about to be a big rumble in telco-land when a bunch of companies and non-profits set up a website with a name like.
0 kommentar(er)
